The Unstated Cost of Our Seafood Choices
The vast and intricate global fishing industry casts a long shadow across our oceans and waterways. While it provides sustenance for billions of people worldwide, it also raises profound ethical concerns. As consumers, we tend to overlook the suffering of aquatic creatures, particularly those confined to the intensive conditions of aquaculture. Fish raised in these facilities are often subjected to overcrowded and stressful environments, leading to a host of welfare issues. They may suffer from diseases, injuries, and stunted growth due to the unnatural conditions in which they are raised.
The Violent Truth of Fish Farming
Aquaculture, the process of fish farming, is promoted as a sustainable and efficient alternative to wild fishing. Commercial wild fishing usually involves trawling with large nets, resulting in large amounts of by-catch and habitat destruction. Reports show that for every three fish caught, one fish is thrown away as by-catch, although the actual number is likely to be much higher. Aquaculture mitigates these issues by farming fish either on-land or in cages in the water, however, it has significant and well-documented issues that undermine its environmental and ethical reputation.
A growing body of evidence shows that fish are sentient beings capable of suffering and feeling pain, yet in aquaculture facilities, fish are frequently raised in severely overcrowded conditions. These cramped quarters prevent fish from engaging in natural behaviors, such as swimming freely or migrating, leaving them physically and psychologically distressed. This stress, coupled with the physical harm and water quality reductions resulting from close confinement, leads to high rates of disease among the fish.
To combat disease outbreaks caused by overcrowding, fish farms often rely on harmful chemicals, including antibiotics and pesticides, which escape into surrounding waters. Not only do these substances harm marine ecosystems, they also contribute to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, posing serious risks to public health. Additionally, uneaten feed and fish waste accumulate in the water, leading to nutrient pollution that disrupts local ecosystems and can trigger harmful algal blooms. These algal blooms can create ‘dead zones’ in the oceans and also negatively impact coastal communities.
The industry’s operations frequently result in environmental destruction, such as the clearing of mangroves for fishponds, which eliminates crucial habitats for many marine and coastal species and destroys one of the earth’s best tools for sucking carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Furthermore, escaped farmed fish can outcompete or interbreed with wild populations, threatening biodiversity and weakening the genetic health of wild stocks.
The most common types of fish that are farmed through aquaculture are carnivorous fish, such as Salmon or Trout. To fully grow, one farmed salmon will be fed around 440 wild-caught fish in its lifetime. Not only is this an extremely inefficient farming method that causes far greater death than appears on the surface, but it also requires more wild fishing, the same problem that aquaculture was trying to initially solve!
Despite its promise, the reality of fish farming reveals profound ethical and ecological challenges that demand greater scrutiny and reform.
The Human Expense
The treatment of workers in the fishing industry highlights severe and pervasive labor abuses. Many individuals employed on fishing vessels endure grueling and hazardous conditions, working excessively long hours with inadequate rest periods. Compensation is often far below fair standards, leaving workers vulnerable to economic exploitation. In some cases, workers report being paid late or not at all, effectively trapping them in exploitative cycles.
Physical abuse and intimidation are also significant issues, with some workers enduring violence or coercion to prevent them from leaving their positions. The lack of oversight and regulation, particularly on vessels operating in international waters, allows these practices to persist unchecked. Additionally, workers frequently operate in dangerous environments without proper safety protocols or equipment, putting their physical well-being at constant risk. Unsurprisingly, the reality for workers on illegal fishing boats is even worse.
This troubling reality underscores the need for greater accountability and enforcement of labor rights within the global fishing industry, as well as support for initiatives aimed at protecting workers from exploitation.
A Jewish Viewpoint
The Jewish principle of tza’ar ba’alei chaim forbids causing unnecessary pain to animals. While Jewish law doesn’t explicitly address the suffering of fish, it emphasizes compassion for all creatures. The principle of pikuach nefesh, the preservation of human life, may necessitate the taking of animal life, but it must always be done with the utmost care and humanity. This means that if we do consume fish, we should strive to do so in a way that minimizes suffering, both for the fish itself and for those who work in the fishing industry. This includes supporting sustainable fishing practices, avoiding overfishing, choosing seafood from responsibly sourced suppliers, and only eating low-impact or vegetarian species, such as anchovies. Seaweed also offers us a plant-based way to get your required omega-3 intake.
However, the reality is that many people can survive without needing to consume fish, as they can access other forms of plant-based protein. Therefore, most people cannot claim pikuach nefesh as a justification for eating fish and should stop eating fish to align with the principle of tza’ar ba’alei chaim. Those people who do rely on fish for survival tend to engage in subsistence fishing, a non-industrial type of fishing that raises far fewer animal welfare, human rights, and environmental concerns.
An Appeal for Reform
A lenient stance towards the consumption of fish has resulted from its classification as pareve, which means it is neither meat nor dairy. It was customary to avoid eating fish and meat together, possibly to clear the palate in between courses even though fish is not considered meat. Fish are frequently used in the Jewish tradition as a metaphor for fertility and abundance. The quick growth of fish, which represents the possibility of expansion and prosperity, is referred to as the blessing of hamalach ha’goel. This same idea of abundance must be applied to all living things, including fish, if we are to guarantee the sustainability of our planet.
We need to reconsider our relationship with fish. Aquatic ecosystems can be preserved, and the suffering of these animals can be lessened, if we as consumers make thoughtful decisions and support more compassionate methods. We can uphold the Jewish principle of tza’ar ba’alei chaim and help create a more sustainable future by adopting a more humane approach to fishing and aquaculture.
Photo by pexels-echoe-z-1049543472-30155033
Sign the pledge to go fish- free
Leave a Reply